MFA Semester Summary 1


            This semester brought on many new ideas for my artwork as well as many changes. Over the course of the semester my work took on a new style, one which is very different from what I originally intended after the residency. Some of the only aspects of my work that did not change are my chosen subject, which is my children, and my medium. This is in part due to the advice and suggestions of my mentor and also due to my need to overcome the frustrations that arose with the original plan for my work. I did a great deal of experimenting this semester and also a great deal of completely starting over and trying something new. Although my current work is almost not at all what I had envisioned after the residency, I am very pleased with the direction my work is now going and I feel as though I have found a way to make my work much more personal in the process.
            My semester got off to a rough start. I had so many ideas from the residency and I knew what I wanted to show, but I was having a very hard time making it work on canvas. My goal was to work on large scale paintings of my children, while experimenting with color palettes and incorporating a much more detailed background to help give the piece more meaning. I also planned on working in a very realistic style as this is what I have always found to be most rewarding. My first problems arose with my idea of paintings the large amount of details that I wanted to capture in that very realistic style on such a large canvas. The project quickly became incredibly frustrating and I ended up starting over on my first few large paintings multiple times because it was just not coming together in the way that I had pictured.
During my first meeting with my mentor, Katy Schneider, she suggested that I put aside the large, detailed paintings and do the complete opposite of what I had planned in order to help loosen up my style and have something to show. She pointed out that I was trying too hard to show too many details and I needed to give up some control. What she suggested was for me to do several very small painting using only a palette knife and to focus only on shape, light and color. While at first I was very frustrated by the lack of control and small size of these palette knife paintings, I soon began to embrace this technique. These new paintings are much looser than any of my precious paintings and also much less realistic. However, I feel that they are just as interesting, or even more so, than my other paintings because of the texture and energy of the paint. Previously when paintings my children I would try to control the chaos of motherhood by controlling the paint, but now through this looser style I am able to express the chaos through the paint. This is something that I have been avoiding, but I have come to find it very refreshing. I have not completely moved away from realism, but with my current paintings I am now doing a combination of both styles.
A few of the other suggestions from my mentor were as follows:
·         Use lighting to help make the scene easier to paint. Plan lighting in order to eliminate extra details and illuminate only those details that I feel are important. This also adds more drama to the scene.
·         Think about scale. Larger spaces surrounding the figures show how small the people are. This is especially important with paintings of children.
·         Don’t be too literal. An eye doesn’t always look like an eye. Sometimes a suggestion of a feature is more than enough.
·         Use more paint. Embrace the texture of the paint and make it an equally important part of the piece.
·         Allow colors to flow throughout the painting. Use a repetition of similar colors to unite the painting.
All of her advice was extremely helpful. I have been using lighting to my advantage by increasing the contrast of what I paint, and therefore making larger dark and light spaces. One of the reasons I was having so much trouble with my first few paintings was because I was using full lighting. All of the details were lighted which was making the scene much too complicated to paint, and also not very interesting due to lack of drama.
Over the semester I continued to paint from photos. The main difference is that I began taking hundreds of photos with the intention of painting them, unlike before when I would work from just one found photo. I have been taking multiple, consecutive photos of the same moment and I then take all those photo of that specific moment and lay them all out. I then work from the group of photos and choose only the pieces that I find important to tell about the moment and use that in my paintings. I give extra attention to thinking about lighting and scale while taking these photos. Based on the advice of my mentor I then do small palette knife paintings of the different photos before jumping into a large scale painting. For some groups of photos I never move on to a large scale painting and only do the palette knife paintings. Seeing all of the small, loose paintings next to each other seems to perfectly capture the moment as each of these moments with my children go by so quickly that even the memories become blurred.
I believe that my current work is now much more personal that my previous work because I am now focusing more on what it’s like to be the mother of my children, instead of just focusing on what my children look like. It was with the help of some of the reading I have done over the semester that I have come to realize that a portrait should be more about what a person is like and not just what a person looks like. I am also able to get more of myself into the paintings through the looser, more expressive mark making.
Some of the artists I’ve looked at this semester whose work has influenced my current work are as follows: Vuillard (placing figures in larger spaces, figures become part of the background),  Fairfield (flat colors, eliminating overuse of details), Susan Lichtman (flat colors, eliminating unnecessary details, space around figures), Giacometti (use of space), Hopper (use of light), Alice Neel (exaggeration), Eric Fischl (realism, storytelling ability), Bonnard (placing figures in larger spaces, repetition of color and background), Soutine (exaggeration, use of color, thickness of paint), Mary Cassatt (children’s portraits), Renoir (children’s portraits, paint handling, use of light and Vermeer (details). Most of these artists were recommended to me by my mentor or at the residency.
The work that I have completed this semester all varies so greatly. My paintings range in size from 2”x2” all the way to 2’x3’. Some of them are painting in a very realistic style, while others are extremely loose or a combination of styles. In some paintings I have used a limited color palette or even completely changed the colors, while in others I stuck to the colors that were naturally there. With this variation of work it is hard to say what direction I would like to focus on for next semester. I have become very interested in the expressive mark making that is possible with the palette knife and I know that I would like to try to further develop this technique. I do still enjoy working large and would like to possibly try to take the same loose method that I have been using for the smaller paintings and do it on a much larger size. I would also like to continue painting my children as they are such a huge part of my life and will always be the most meaningful of subjects for me.

No comments:

Post a Comment